|
Index: Stress perception
and coping, Classroom Behaviours, Win/Win Solutions.
Abstract: Much of
the stress of teaching is related to problem behaviour in
the classrooms. The most effective way of managing behavioural
problems is to prevent them from arising, and to minimize
their occurrence. The focus is the teacher's ability and willingness
to create a successful learning situation appropriate to the
student's needs. Essentially, stress can be a challenging,
exciting stimulus to personal growth, whilst excessive stress
can prove damaging to psychological and physical health because
it often triggers emotional and physical strain that may be
harmful. So, people are motivated to cope with stress. However,
the reactions to stress and its adaptive value vary from one
person to the next and from time to time for the same person.
Decisions about how to cope can consequently be complex. Thus,
this paper will highlight some of the more adaptive stress
coping strategies, with examples and cases drawn from the
authour's experiences in teaching as well as from her research
towards secondary school teachers in Hong Kong.
Dr. Gloria Chan is an Associate
Professor in the Asia International Open University and a
Senior Training Consultant in the Super Talent Concept Consultants
Ltd. and HK Competitiveness Centre. Prior to which she was
a teaching and learning adviser in the Vocational Training
Council. She is the executive committee member of the Hong
Kong Public Administration Association and a Graduate member
of the Hong Kong Psychological Society. Her research interests
include locus of control in relation to stress management
and coping, job satisfaction and burnout, classroom management.
She is now conducting a series of stress and classroom management
workshops for teachers in HKUSPACE, primary, secondary schools
and institutes in Hong Kong. This paper has been presented
in the IVETA 2000 Conference in Hong Kong.
INTRODUCTION
Occupation provides an important
source of need satisfaction (Arnold, Robertson, and Cooper,
1993). For example, a job is attractive because of the external
rewards it can bring from pay, grades, rewards, obligations
and approval. In contrast, a person may be motivated intrinsically
when his/her higher levels of needs are met, such as job activities
which bring respect, admiration, allows for development of
personal potential, competence or means of self-fulfillment.
Job satisfaction is of great importance because it is an important
domain of life that influence satisfaction (i.e. family, health,
community, work and spare time activity etc.).
STRESS PERCEPTION AND
COPING
Some experience of stress
and anxiety is normal. Indeed, mild stress can actually be
beneficial and produce alertness and interest. Some stress
is invited, especially that which produces enjoyment and motivation
in work and life (Selye, 1984). However, the level of stress
one perceives varies greatly from one person to another (Carver,
Weintraub and Scheier, 1989; Fontana, and Abouserie, 1993).
If stress is not managed properly, it can damage performance.
Prolonged stress and anxiety may lead to physical illnesses
(Maslach and Jackson, 1993). Emerging problems and some adaptive
coping strategies are discussed.
Classroom discipline,
student violence and apathy. Most of problems raised by
teachers are related to discipline or study problems of students.
Problems appear more significant for academically low achieving
students. Sometimes these problems manifest themselves as
physical or verbal abuse, yet more often they present themselves
as minor yet disruptive behaviour which, whilst not immediately
challenging the authourity of the teachers, demand the expenditure
of inordinate amounts of teacher time and energy. Some teachers
may place the blame for behavioural and academic problems
on the students' poor standard, inattentiveness and laziness.
These teachers become defensive and irritated when confronted
by students' misbehaviour, they find it difficult to look
hard at themselves, their methods and attitudes. On the other
hand, others will reflect and evaluate on their teaching practices
to see if they have contributed to the observed problems.
Kounin (1970) reported that there is no difference between
more and less successful teachers in terms of effectiveness
in dealing with behaviour problems, but successful teachers
are seen to be far more adept at preventing them. Bull and
Solity (1993) have outlined some of the constructive ways
to deal with problem behaviours:
- Intervene as early as possible,
- Use the lowest level of intervention necessary, according
to the misbehaviour and its effects on learning, relationships
and safety,
- Keep the time and attention given to misbehaviours to
a minimum,
- Handle misbehaviours in a firm and matter-of-fact way;
avoid showing unwanted behaviour for the teacher himself,
- Once dealt with, misbehaviours should be treated as finished;
any counselling should take place at other times,
- Use all corrections consistently and fairly,
- Take active steps to teach and maintain appropriate behaviours;
use far more rewards than corrections,
- Use misbehaviours as pointers to improvements for one's
classroom management.
Teachers find that misbehaved
students are mostly under-achievers, they tend to have low
self-concept, which often results in a lack of motivation
for learning. They often feel insecure and alienated from
school. These students respond to failure by focusing even
more on their own inadequacy; their attitudes toward assignments
may deteriorate even further (Ames, 1985). So, intervention
of students' misbehaviour should be non-judgmental to prevent
students from retaliating. Students should be guided to learn
how to take responsibility of their own actions without the
feelings of shame, humiliation and being ridiculed. Feedback
also plays a crucial role for the student in defining his
or her self-perception of ability. If the performance is satisfactory,
future tasks are likely to be approached with confidence (Charlton
and David, 1994). Consequently, classroom events shall be
tackled systematically and consistently so that students will
learn to behave in a desirable manner and be rewarded for
doing so. Where behaviour problems arise in schools, it may
be difficult to determine or explain precisely why students
behave as they do, as behaviours are affected by a whole range
of variables, usually in combination. For example, expectations
from teachers, parents and the students themselves can be
influential. They will reflect the ways in which students
predict their own performance level and shape their achievement
orientation, actual performance and attribution for success
(Yee, 1992). Self-expectation is learned as it depends on
previous experiences. It is, in part, influenced by teachers,
parents and others, who signal their expectations through
their interactions with individuals. Students with learning
difficulties tend to have low self-esteem and low expectations
of themselves. If expectations from teachers and parents are
unrealistic, students may precipitate fears and anxieties
within them which cause untold misery and unhappiness, then
motivation to learn is lost. However, over permissiveness
may also create anxieties, as students may require boundaries
or guidelines within which they can act and feel secure (Clarizio
and McCoy, 1983).
Demand on Time. One
of the most frequently cited work-related stress factors is
the demand on time. The excessive paperwork duties takes time
away from teaching duties. The stress engendered by paperwork
is almost certainly related to teachers' perceptions of a
lack of professional respect accorded them. Time spent on
paperwork is not just inconvenient but is an additional burden
on top of an already too busy day. Good time management helps
teachers to manage the ever-increasing level and complexity
of work demands. Basically, it involves managing oneself and
others(Covey, 1989). Teachers are found to achieve satisfaction
from their work differently which has an impact on time management.
For instances, some teachers consider task satisfaction to
stem from carrying out work to a higher standard than other
teachers. Not surprisingly, these teachers found it hard to
delegate. Similarly, some teachers were only satisfied if
the work was as near to perfection as possible. Likewise,
these teachers have found it hard to meet deadlines. Still,
there are teachers whose social satisfaction comes from solicitous
care of students. They may be too keen to offer help to students
and others, which take away times for essential tasks. Inability
to manage time effectively may cause inconvenience to others,
the institution will lose its efficiency. Furthermore, extended
working hours will be detrimental to the personal life of
the individual. More importantly, it may lead to important
tasks being neglected in favour of urgent ones. The enemy
of the "best" is often the "good." So, one must keep in mind
to be able to say "no" to something if it is not to the apparent,
urgent things in life.
In essence, effective time
management is putting first things first (Covey, Merrill,
and Merrill, 1999). In the essay "The Common Denominator of
Success" written by E.M. Gray, that the successful person
has the habit of doing the things Failures don't like to do,
they don't like doing them either necessarily. But their disliking
is subordinated to the strength of their purpose (Covey, 1989).
Drucker (1954) explained that effective people are not problem-minded,
they are opportunity-minded. They feed opportunity and starve
problems. They think preventively. They have genuine crises
and emergencies that require their immediate attention, but
the number is comparatively small because they constantly
strike a balance and keep focus on the important, but not
urgent, high leverage capacity-building activities. As a consequence,
one's effectiveness would increase dramatically. The crises
and problems would shrink to manageable proportions because
of one's actions in thinking ahead, working on the roots,
doing the preventive things that keep situations from developing
into crises in the first place.
Furthermore, effective time
management requires organization, planning, prioritising,
communication, trust and discipline. Plans must be reviewed
and adapted in the light of opportunities or difficulties
in response to the needs and wants of individuals, families
or to possibilities that open up as a result of new developments.
Covey (1989) suggested six important criteria to the organisation
of time. The first is coherence. Coherence suggests that there
is harmony, unity, and integrity between one's vision and
mission, roles and goals (both short- and long-term), priorities
and plans, desires and discipline. The second is balance.
Balance is a tool to keep balance in one's life so that the
individual will not neglect important areas such as health,
family, professional preparation, or personal development.
Covey (1989) stressed that many people seem to think that
success in one area can compensate for failure in other areas
of life, but can it really? "Perhaps it can for a limited
time in some areas. But can success in your profession compensate
for a broken marriage, ruined health, or weakness in personal
character? True effectiveness requires balance" (p.161). The
third is focus. It is a tool that encourages, motivates and
actually helps a person spend the time dealing with prevention
rather than prioritising crises. The fourth is people. One
would need a tool that deals effective with people, not just
schedules. It is focused on effective, synergistic interaction
with people. The paradigm is people first, things second.
It is leadership first, management second. It is effectiveness
first, efficiency second. It is purpose first, structure second.
It is vision first, method second. The fifth is flexibility.
The planning tool should be the servant instead of one's master.
The plan should be tailored to one's own style, needs and
particular ways. Finally, the tool should be portable so that
it can be carried with the person most of the time within
reach and to facilitate constant reviewing. Teachers have
always worked under pressure and for many, today's pressures
outweigh their ability to cope with them, resulting in stress
related symptoms. In terms of health-related behaviour, when
people are under stress, they often do not take proper care
of themselves. For example, teachers reported that they frequently
take students' assignments and exam papers home to mark. They
may skip meals or snack on junk food. People under stress
cease normal exercise routines and become sedentary. These
behaviours may impact upon the immune system and so reduce
the body's ability to fight disease. This behaviour may also
affect the general functioning of the body and may contribute
to the development of illness. If stress are 'bottled up'
for long periods, there are risks of psychosomatic symptoms
such as headaches, stomach upsets, nervousness, sleep disturbances,
depression, fatigue, high blood pressure and skin disorders
as reported by many stressed teachers (Cole and Walker, 1989;
Travers and Coopers, 1990). Thus, stress may indirectly affect
health by reducing positive health behaviours and increasing
negative ones.
Managing Stress through
Exercising. People who have made concerted efforts to
improve their physical health and well-being have made great
differences to their ability to manage effectively whilst
those who do not wish they have addressed the issue earlier.
Exercise generates more energy than it uses. Professor Steptoe
and his colleagues (The Health Promotion Research Trust, 1989)
have found that normal adults benefit psychologically from
regular physical activities. Moderate exercise schedule, about
20 minutes of vigorous rhythmic exercise three or four times
a week, is enough to reduce tension and anxiety, clear up
mental confusion and improves ability to cope with stress.
The reason is that although the heart is a muscle, it cannot
be exercised directly. It can only exercise through the large
muscle groups, particularly the leg muscles. That's why exercises
like rapid walking, running, biking, swimming, cross-country
skiing, and jogging are so beneficial.
Coping with the pace of
change. The second factor raised by teachers is the demands
as a result of frequent changes in social, technological and
educational policies. On the positive end, it has revolutionize
communications, video technology creates new teaching techniques
and provides an analytical tool to fasten improvement. On
the downside, they make current knowledge, skills and values
obsolete. They need to take extra time to learn new concepts
and techniques, revise curriculum from time to time and subsequently
all the notes, worksheets and activities to cater for the
changes. Additionally, there are related meetings and paper
works associated with proposed changes. Change scares some
people because it often begins with feelings of disequilibrium,
incompetence and discomfort (Whitaker, 1995). This dissonance
leads to a drive to restore equilibrium. Possible consequences
are that they reject, suppress and distort their perceptions
of reality rather than face the inevitable stress of handling
it. So, the major obstacle to the implementation of new policies,
goals or methods of operation is the resistance of people
to change. Resistance to change comes in two forms-systematic
and behavioural (Plant, 1987). Systematic resistance tends
to occur when there is a lack of knowledge, information, skill
and managerial capacity. Behavioural resistance is more emotionally
centred and derives from the reactions, perceptions and assumptions
of individuals and groups in the organisation. Lack of trust,
for example, is much more difficult to manage than lack of
information or the lack of resources. It is suggested that
in order to reduce the resistance, the managers should increase
participants' levels of involvement and information, listen
to the experience of those involved in change and seek to
understand what is felt to be threatened. The managers need
to be deeply caring and concerned about what it is that staff
feel they are having to give up and to be seen as an ally
and not as an opponent in the change process. Much pain and
discomfort can be avoided if these ideas can be incorporated
in the values and assumptions that underpin approaches to
management and leadership. A great deal of stress within organisation
staff can be traced back to insensitive and clumsy handling
of innovation and change.
Relations with others.
The third factor reported by teachers is connected with interpersonal
relationships with their students, co-workers or superiors.
There are different believes that teachers hold regarding
their relations with students. Some teachers believed that
teachers should be more authouritative and always keep a distance
from the students if they are to effectively manage class
discipline. This group of teachers appears to experience frequent
confrontations with students (Ormrod, 1995). In comparison,
some teachers have adopted a more permissive style, although
when necessary, will adopt an authouritative approach. Teachers
who adopt a more democratic approach report good student/teacher
relationship. In schools where the culture is highly Power
oriented facilitates the existence of office politics. Lack
of recognition for good teaching, lack of participation in
decision-making and a lack of friendly atmosphere among staff
characterise the climate in those schools. In this circumstances,
if a large reserve of trust is not sustained by continuing
deposits, relations between people will deteriorate. Instead
of rich, spontaneous understanding and communication, the
situation becomes one of accommodations, where people attempt
to work independent lifestyle in a fairly tolerant way. The
relationship may further deteriorate to one of hostility and
defensiveness. The "fight or flight" response creates verbal
battles, slammed doors, refusal to talk, emotional withdrawal
and self-pity which end up in cold war, endless confess of
the sins of one another and a loss/loss political battle.
But there really is no quick fix. Building relationships are
long-term investments and repairing relationships takes time.
To act effectively in interpersonal
contexts, there is a need to develop an understanding of the
various forces that affect the ways in which groups of people
work together in order to develop an awareness of the options
in choosing how to behave towards each other. The development
of interpersonal skills involves looking inwards (Covey, 1989).
This presupposes that until one can understand oneself, the
individual will have difficulties in improving one's relations
with others. Requisite qualities are: communication skills,
cooperative skills and interpersonal skills. Qualities such
as personal warmth and an ability and willingness to project
a genuine interest in others, the ability to promote the owning
and sharing of personal ideas and feelings with appropriate
others, and being receptive to the need of others to do the
same are also important. A 'good' interpersonal climate is
one that is relatively free of power differentials, competition
and unfavourable comparison of one individual with another.
However, this is not the usual institutional climate as highlighted
by teachers in many educational settings (Dunham, 1992). Teachers
who have perceived a lack of personal control as a result
of the authourity structure feel helpless and are afraid that
their efforts to cope will lead to failure, embarrassment
and signs of inadequacies. This in turn leaves them with feelings
of uncomfortable about not being able to reciprocate, or with
the belief that his or her personal control is limited by
it. This helps to explain why this group of teachers have
reported severe stress level even though they have used a
number of constructive stress coping techniques whilst others
working in similar environment have reported comparatively
less stressful.
Conflicts in teaching
philosophy. Finally, the tension in the work of teaching
is cast in terms of conflicting teaching philosophy and institutional
demands (Feiman, and Floden, 1986). From the perspective of
the teachers, teaching includes all those aspects directly
related to the realization of educational goals: motivating
students to learn, assessing knowledge, getting to know them
as individuals, etc. Teaching is a balanced system in which
all components support and align to each other. Imbalance
in the system will lead to a breakdown to poor teaching and
surface learning. Non-alignment is signified by inconsistencies,
unmet expectations and practices that contradict what a teacher
preaches. Many teachers reported that traditional transmission
theories of teaching ignore alignment. The common assessment
method of determining students' academic achievement is to
compare their performance to each other ('norm-referenced'),
rather than on whether an individual's learning meets the
objectives ('criterion-referenced'). They criticised that
school administration and policies from local education authourity
always dominate the professionalism of teachers. The assessment
criteria fails to project inherent relations between what
is taught and what are tested Brown and Knight (1995). They
also voiced constraints due to some administrative requirements
and resource limitations that make alignment difficult, for
example, summative assessment in the form of tests and examinations
are often used to discriminate and filter students for promotion
to higher education which encourage surface approach to learning.
CONCLUSION
Job dissatisfaction may
produce reactions which are detrimental to the individuals
as well as to the organization's aims and objectives (Arnold,
Robertson and Cooper, 1993; Edworthy, 2000). If feelings of
being anxious are slight, teachers may experience a sense
of stimulation and alertness which is pleasurable rather than
stressful. Excessive demands may initiate the arousal of higher
levels of anxiety. These may be unproductive in the sense
that a teacher's ability to make decisions is impaired or
the ability to concentrate is reduced. There may be a sharp
loss to confidence in teaching. Therefore, the identification
of stress in relation to job satisfaction and the way teachers
cope with stress is the central theme of this paper. To conclude,
on the one hand, teachers are restricted by the institutional
climate, the rules and procedures set by administrators, that
they have to follow as best as they may. As to the classroom
climate, that is more under their control. Most serious problem
behaviours demand more time, energy and greater expertise
than lesser ones, it seems more sensible, wherever practicable,
to prevent problems arising, or less serious ones escalating.
In addition, it is also important that the wanted behaviour
should be rewarded consistently, firmly and fairly over time.
The kind of atmosphere they create --authouritative, democratic,
permissive, open, cold and warm -- can remarkably affect the
effectiveness of a teaching approach. All aspects of teaching
are mutually supportive, each is an integral part of the total
system, not an add-on. To align constructively, it is part
of the teachers' role to reflect on their present skills and
their style in order to analyze and remedy weaknesses for
themselves and identify and build upon strengths. Spoon-feeding
does the work for the students, so that they have little left
to do but obediently swallow.
It is fair that everyone,
no matter he is rich or poor, has 24 hours in a day, so, it
depends on how efficiently and wisely one can in the use of
time. No one can extend the length of life time for an hour
more, however, one can adjust the breadth to make it more
enriching and fulfilling. People who make efforts to adapt
become more resilient to the stresses and strains and they
can fight off infections more easily. People who make efforts
to change their lifestyles, such as eating the right kinds
of foods, getting sufficient rest and relaxation, and exercising
on a regular basis, are seen to be more healthy. But individuals
who ignore their lifestyles are likely to experience ill health.
Finally, one of the most
identifiable constraints affecting teachers' choices of coping
strategies is perception of their ability to control. People's
perceptions can be vastly different. They have lived with
their paradigms for years, thinking they are "facts", and
some of them may even question the character or the mental
competence of anyone who cannot see the facts. So, if a teacher
is very frustrated because his superior is locked into what
he feels is an unproductive leadership style, how can he/she
transcends the limits of his/her perceptions so that he/she
can deeply communicate, and cooperatively deal with the issues
and come up with Win/Win solutions? The deepest hunger of
the human heart is to be understood. Seeking to understand
requires consideration whilst seeking to be understood takes
courage. In order to strive for a Win/Win situation, it requires
a high degree of both qualities. The essence of achieving
synergy is to value differences--to respect them, to build
on strengths, to compensate for weaknesses (Covey, Merrill,
and Merrill, 1999).
REFERENCES
- Ames, C. (1985) Attributions and cognition in motivation
theory. In Alderman & M. Cohen (Eds.), Motivation theory
and practice for pre-service teachers (pp. 16-21). Washington,
DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
- Arnold, J. Robertson, I.T. and Cooper, C.L. (1993) Work
Psychology:Understanding human behaviour in the workplace.
Pitman Publishing.
- Brown, S. and Knight, P. (1995) Assessing Learners in
Higher Education. London, Kogan Page.
- Carver, C.S., Weintraub, J.K., & Scheier, M.F. (1989)
Assessing Coping Strategies: A theoretical based approach,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
- Charlton, T. and David, K. (1994) Managing misbehaviour
in schools, London: Routledge.
- Clarizio, H.F. and McCoy, G.F. (1983) Behaviour Disorders
in Children, New York: Harper & Row.
- Cole, M. & Walker, S. (1989) Teaching and Stress, Open
University Press, Milton Keynes, Philadelphia.
- Covey, S.R. (1989) The seven habits of highly effective
people, New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Covey, S.R., Merrill, A. R. and Merrill, R.R. (1999) First
things first: Coping with the ever-increasing demands of
the workplace. Franklin Covey Co.
- Drucker, P.F. (1954) The Practice of Management, Harper
and Row. New York.
- Dunham, J. (1992) Stress in teaching, Routledge, London
and New York.
- Edworthy, A. (2000) Managing Stress, Open University Press.
- Feiman, N.S. and Floden, R.E. (1986) The culture of teaching,
in Handbook of research in education (3rd ed.)
(pp. 505-526), New York: Macmillan.
- Fontana, D. and Abouserie, R. (1993) Stress levels, gender
and personality factors in teachers, British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 63, 261-270
- Health Promotion Research Trust (1989) Less Stress More
Success, Cambridge: Health Promotion Research Trust.
- Kounin, J. (1970) Discipline and Group Management in Classrooms,
New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Maslach, C. & Jackson, S.E. (1993) Maslach Burnout Inventory
Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, seven
printing.
- Ormrod, J.E. (1995) Educational Psychology: Principles
and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
- Plant, R. (1987) Managing Change and making it stick,
London: Fontana.
- Selye, H. (1984) The stress of life, revised edition,
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
- Travers, C. and Cooper,C. (1990) Survey on occupational
stress among teachers in the United Kingdom, Manchester:
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.
- Whitaker, P. (1995) Managing change in schools, Open University
Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia.
- Yee, A. H. (1992) Asians as stereotypes and students:
Misperceptions that persist. Educational Psychology Review,
4, 95-132.
|